On this day, 35 years ago, June 25th, 1988, my father and mother got married. They chose to start their lives together and to start a family.
On this day, 84 years ago, on June 25th, 1939, a woman by the name of Margaret Sanger introduced an initiative to end Black families. The initiative is what she called ‘the Negro Project.’
Margaret Sanger was a Nazi collaborator, beloved Ku Klux Klan speaker, and eugenicist. A eugenicist is someone who believes that the quality of human life can be improved by eradicating certain ethnic groups, physically disabled, and any other group of people that are deemed “inferior.” Much like Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party, Sanger was a major proponent of eliminating physically and mentally challenged human beings through abortion; but the crown jewel of her efforts while she was alive–her Sistine Chapel, if you will–was her tireless work to eradicate the Black race.
In the ‘Negro Project,’ Sanger outlines the stratagem she believed most effective in wooing the Black community into a cult a self-destruction; the Black church. Some today still argue that Sanger was not for the extermination, but rather the limitation of the Black race. What people choose to defend will tell a lot about their state of mind; because first-off, even if that were true, it would still make her a racist woman with an evil agenda to cut the Black population down. Even if we accept the premise that Sanger’s intentions were to keep us from having as many babies as we would have without her interference, it still greatly begs the question ‘why?’
Nevertheless, here is how we know her plans were in fact to exterminate the Black population. This is a direct quote from her book, ‘the Negro Project.’
“The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation, as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members"
Not only was Sanger’s intention to exterminate, she had a plan to make sure it did not seem that way, and she was not alone in this endeavor. Some have argued that Sanger was not concealing an evil agenda, but simply stating that she did not want her efforts to be misconstrued. Those who make such arguments very narrowly focus on her words, and her words alone. A simple look at who Sanger was closely associated with, will reveal more.
A man by the name of Frederic Osborn, who was the Founding member of the American Eugenics Society, as well as friend and signatory of Margaret Sanger’s Citizens Committee for Planned Parenthood, says this about selling eugenics to the populace:
“Eugenic goals are most likely attained under a name other than eugenics.”
A classic disinformation technique is to change words and definitions. If you can convince the public that your false definition is true, you can change the way they think. It is not a coincidence that the founder of Planned Parenthood, her colleague, and many others on her team share the view that in order to carry out their goals, they have to pretend like the goalpost is somewhere else. Why would one need to do that? Sanger sums up eugenics quite artfully when she coined it as the “the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extinction, of defective stocks — those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”
Even with this blatant information, some today still fall for her PR stunts; or they are complicit in this ruse Sanger established. There are many academic studies that make the case that Sanger’s only interest was in helping uplift the Black community. That her goals were not to exterminate, or even limit, but to provide ‘birth control’ so that Blacks could have an opportunity to mobilize and elevate. I won’t link the entire study here, but there is one written by a Ph.D professor by the name of Joyce Follet, and Follet cites a particular letter that Sanger wrote in November of 1939, just five months after the launching of her ‘Negro Project.’
Dr. Follet continues by writing:
“Sanger and Rose saw promise in birth control as a community strategy of African American survival and progress. In their proposal for funding from philanthropist Albert Lasker, they touted the project as ‘a unique experiment in the field of race-building, as well as in the field of humanitarian service for a race that has been subjected to discrimination, hardship and segregation.’
One might see how difficult it may be to believe that someone as learned and seemingly involved as Dr. Follet would be blind to Sanger’s publicly admitted strategy of couching eugenics in words like ‘humanitarian service’ and ‘race-building.’ The only race Margaret Sanger and her cohorts were interested in building was the White race, yet somehow, scholars write lengthy essays to try and prove the opposite. One of Sanger’s main approaches was to deceive Blacks into thinking her intentions were pure, and, as my peers say, we have all the receipts. Surely Dr. Follet has come across Sanger’s other writings. Surely Dr. Follet has actually read Sanger’s ‘the Negro Project’ in its entirety before writing an essay defending it.
Sanger's views and actions have become such a stench, that Planned Parenthood itself now admits that she was a eugenist, linked to Nazis, and affiliated with the KKK. How is it possible then, that someone whose ethos includes weeding out ‘weak,’ and ‘dysgenic,’ people–who shared views with leading German Nazi scientists–simultaneously want the betterment of Black American society?
The answer is, it isn’t possible.
Margaret Sanger, Frederic Osborn, and their entire team of eugenists pulled one of the biggest cons in history, said out loud what their strategy was, and carried it out.
Now, 84 years later and decades after both of their deaths, we are still letting them fool us.
The late president of South Africa, Nelson Mandela once said, “The true character of society is revealed in how it treats its children.” If that statement is true, our society is sick and dying, along with the over 60 million babies we’ve ‘legally’ aborted since 1973.
There is considerable blood on our hands, and judgment is already on our nation. That should not stop us, however, from choosing life. Embracing life. Wanting life. Dark forces wanting to kill babies and exterminate entire groups of people have existed since time immemorial.
Now there arose a new king over Egypt. He knew nothing about Yosef but said to his people, "Look, the descendants of Israel have become a people too numerous and powerful for us. Come, let's use wisdom in dealing with them. Otherwise, they'll continue to multiply; and in the event of war they might ally themselves with our enemies, fight against us and leave the land altogether.”
“Moreover, the king of Egypt spoke to the Hebrew midwives, one of whom was called Shifrah and the other Pu'ah. "When you attend the Hebrew women and see them giving birth," he said, "if it's a boy, kill him; but if it's a girl, let her live." However, the midwives were God-fearing women, so they didn't do as the king of Egypt ordered but let the boys live.”
-Exodus 1:8-10, 15-18
The spirit of Pharaoh is alive and well; and just because the veil of that spirit today is one of ‘reproductive rights,’ means nothing. Make no mistake. We have modern-day eugenists walking among us; some are teaching in our universities, some wear white coats and have recited the hippocratic oath, and some even preach from pulpits. And for those who are honest, we are seeing the degrading effects it has had on not just the Black community, but our country.
The eugenists of old were able to successfully change terms and definitions so that now, we lump killing babies in the womb with ‘birth control’ or ‘healthcare’ or even ‘selfcare’ when murder has nothing to do with any of those terms. Now those words are being applied to unhinged activists in high places who are pushing hard for little kids to have experimental sex-change surgeries, girls getting their breasts cut off, boys being given puberty blockers to ‘transition’ them to the opposite sex. That movement is rooted in evil, even satanic progenitors. That is another article for another day.
We must resist death and choose life. All of us. We have to be the Shifrahs and Pu'ahs who risked everything and refused Pharoah’s orders. That has to be us. Until we do that, none of us are free.
On this day, 84 years ago, on June 25th, 1939, a woman by the name of Margaret Sanger introduced what she called her ‘Negro Project.’ I think the more appropriate term for it now is ‘the American Project.’
I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and curse. Therefore choose life, that you and your offspring may live.
-Deuteronomy 30:19